Test 2: The Universal Impact of Sin

A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Essential Foundation: Defining Sin

Before examining the universal impact of sin, we must establish what sin actually is according to Scripture. The apostle John provides the definitive legal definition: "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4). The Greek word for transgression here is "anomia" - literally "lawlessness" or violation of law. This definition is juridically precise: sin is not merely falling short of an ideal or failing to achieve potential. Sin is specifically the transgression of divine law.

Paul confirms this legal framework with absolute clarity: "Where no law is, there is no transgression" (Romans 4:15) and "sin is not imputed when there is no law" (Romans 5:13). These statements create an unbreakable logical chain that governs everything that follows in our analysis. If sin exists, law must exist. If sin is universal, the law transgressed must be universal. If sin brings death as its penalty, the law violated must carry death as its prescribed punishment. This raises the critical question: which law defines sin?

Essential Foundation: Distinguishing the Two Laws

Scripture presents two distinct categories of law, and conflating them leads to profound theological error. Understanding this distinction is essential for determining which law's transgression constitutes sin and which aspects of biblical law continue after the cross.

The Moral Law (The Ten Commandments)

The moral law possesses unique characteristics that set it apart from all other biblical legislation. God Himself wrote these commandments with His own finger: "And he gave unto Moses... two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God" (Exodus 31:18). The divine authorship is emphasized again: "And the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables" (Exodus 32:16).

These commandments were written on stone, symbolizing permanence and unchangeability. Stone endures where parchment deteriorates. They were placed inside the ark of the covenant (Deuteronomy 10:5), directly under the mercy seat where God's presence dwelt between the cherubim. No other writings occupied this most sacred space - only these ten commandments formed the foundation of God's throne on earth.

This law defines sin itself. Paul states, "I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet" (Romans 7:7), directly referencing the tenth commandment. "By the law is the knowledge of sin" (Romans 3:20). The moral law reveals God's character and defines what violates that character.

The Ceremonial Law (The Mosaic Ordinances)

The ceremonial law encompasses the sacrificial system, feast days, cleansing rituals, and other ordinances that dealt with the remedy for sin. Moses, not God, physically wrote these laws: "And Moses wrote this law" (Deuteronomy 31:9) and "it came to pass, when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book" (Deuteronomy 31:24). While divinely inspired, they were written by human hand on perishable material, suggesting temporary duration.

This book of the law was placed "in the side of the ark of the covenant" (Deuteronomy 31:26) - beside it, not inside it. This physical separation from the Ten Commandments symbolized its distinct nature and purpose. The ceremonial law revealed the remedy for sin through types and shadows: "Which was a figure for the time then present" (Hebrews 9:9) and "the law having a shadow of good things to come" (Hebrews 10:1).

Paul explicitly states this law was "added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made" (Galatians 3:19). The "seed" connects directly to humanity's first promise in Genesis 3:15. This promise was given to all humanity through Eve, not to any specific ethnic group. The ceremonial law was added to explain how this universally promised seed would remedy the universal sin problem.

Essential Foundation: The Wages of Sin

Having established that sin is transgression of the moral law, we must understand its penalty. Romans 6:23 states with legal precision: "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." The word "wages" (opsMnion) means earned payment or deserved compensation. Death is not arbitrary punishment but the juridical consequence of law transgression.

Scripture distinguishes between two deaths, and this distinction is crucial for understanding both universal impact and personal accountability. The first death is physical mortality affecting all humanity, righteous and wicked alike: "It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" (Hebrews 9:27). This universal mortality came through Adam: "By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin" (Romans 5:12).

The second death is the true judicial penalty for personal sin: "The fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death" (Revelation 21:8). This death results from personal transgression of known law.

The Universal Impact Analysis

With these foundations established, we can now properly examine how Adam's sin created universal consequences for all humanity. Romans 5:12 establishes the principle of federal headship: "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." The Greek construction indicates that all humanity participated in Adam's sin through federal representation - when Adam sinned as humanity's authorized representative, all sinned in him.

This federal principle, while foreign to modern individualism, was well understood in ancient legal systems where heads of households entered binding covenants for all descendants. The same principle operates in reverse through Christ: "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive" (1 Corinthians 15:22). To reject federal representation in Adam's case would logically require rejecting it in Christ's case, undermining substitutionary atonement itself.

The Inherited Condition vs Personal Accountability

Through Adam's federal transgression, humanity inherits a corrupted nature and physical mortality. This fallen condition inevitably leads to personal sins once individuals reach accountability. However, the second death - eternal separation from God - results from personal transgression of known law, not merely from inherited nature.

Romans 5:14 clarifies this distinction: "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression." Physical death reigned universally as a consequence of living in a fallen world, but those who hadn't personally transgressed wouldn't necessarily face the second death. This explains why infants who die before personal accountability, while experiencing physical death due to Adam's sin, are not held liable for the second death.

The distinction is legally crucial. Adam's sin brought:

  1. Universal physical mortality (the first death)
  2. A corrupted nature inclining toward sin
  3. Separation from Eden and direct divine fellowship
  4. Need for redemption humans cannot provide themselves

Personal sins bring individual liability for the second death based on transgression of known law, whether written or in conscience (Romans 2:14-15).

The Legal Necessity of Universal Law

Even with this refined understanding, the universal impact establishes the necessity of universal moral law. The logical progression is inescapable:

  1. Adam's sin corrupted human nature universally
  2. This corruption inevitably produces personal sin in all who reach accountability
  3. "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23)
  4. Sin requires law to define it ("sin is the transgression of the law")
  5. Therefore, moral law must be universally applicable

The universality of sin across all cultures and times demonstrates the universality of moral law. Every human society recognizes some actions as wrong, evidencing the law written on hearts (Romans 2:14-15) - a residual echo of the perfect law originally inherent in unfallen human nature.

The Continuity of Moral Law

The fact that humanity universally bears consequences of breaking the law in Eden suggests humanity remains under that law's authority. In legal terms, if violation creates ongoing liability passing to descendants, the law violated must still be in force. A repealed law cannot create new liability. The continuing reality of death proves the continuing authority of the law whose violation brought death.

Furthermore, Christ's death confirms both the universal impact of sin and the continuing authority of the law. One cannot pay a penalty for breaking a law that no longer exists. Christ's sacrifice simultaneously validates the law's ongoing authority and provides the remedy for breaking it.

Implications for the Sabbath

If the moral law existed from creation (as Test 1 established), and if all humanity bears the consequences of its violation through Adam, then all humanity remains under its authority unless explicitly released from specific provisions. The Sabbath, being part of the Ten Commandments written by God's finger, belongs to this moral law category.

The New Covenant doesn't release humanity from moral law but writes it on hearts: "I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts" (Hebrews 8:10). The problem was never the law itself but humanity's inability to keep it due to sin's impact. The solution is not abolishing the law but providing both forgiveness for breaking it (justification) and power to keep it (sanctification).

Establishing Universal Application Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The evidence overwhelmingly establishes that the moral law applies to all humanity, not exclusively to the Jewish people. This conclusion rests on multiple independent lines of irrefutable evidence:

Chronological Evidence

The moral law predates the existence of the Jewish nation by millennia. Genesis 2:2-3 establishes the Sabbath at creation week, before sin, before any ethnic distinctions existed. Cain was judged for murder (Genesis 4:9-11) approximately 2,500 years before Abraham, the father of the Jewish nation. Joseph called adultery "sin against God" (Genesis 39:9) before Israel existed as a nation. These pre-Jewish recognitions of moral law prove its universal application. One cannot violate a law to which one is not subject.

The Adamic Evidence

Adam was the federal head of all humanity, not of Jews only. Romans 5:12 states "death passed upon all men" through Adam's sin - not upon Jews only. If only Jews were affected by Adam's transgression, only Jews would die physically. The universality of death proves the universality of the law broken. Paul explicitly states: "Death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression" (Romans 5:14). Death reigned over all peoples, proving all were under the law whose violation brought death.

The Promise Evidence

The seed promised in Genesis 3:15 was promised to "the woman" - Eve, mother of all living (Genesis 3:20), not mother of Jews only. This promise was given approximately 2,000 years before Abraham. If the moral law applied only to Jews, then the promise of redemption from breaking that law would apply only to Jews. But Scripture declares Christ died "for the sins of the whole world" (1 John 2:2), proving the law transgressed was universal in scope.

The Gentile Judgment Evidence

Romans 2:12 states: "For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law." But then Paul immediately clarifies in verses 14-15: "For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness."

This proves definitively that Gentiles have the moral law written on their hearts and are judged by it. They cannot be judged by a law that doesn't apply to them. The fact that Gentiles are judged proves they are under law - not the written law given at Sinai, but the same moral principles written on hearts.

The Pre-Sinai Evidence

Abraham "kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws" (Genesis 26:5) 430 years before Sinai. The nations destroyed in the flood were judged by moral standards. Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for violations of moral law. These judgments occurred before the Jewish nation existed. God does not judge people by laws that don't apply to them. The pre-Jewish judgments prove pre-Jewish law application.

The Christ Evidence

Jesus declared: "The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath" (Mark 2:27). He didn't say "made for Jews" but "for man" - anthropos, humanity. This statement by the Creator Himself establishes the Sabbath's universal intent. Furthermore, Christ's death was necessary precisely because the law couldn't be changed or limited. If the law applied only to Jews, only Jews would need redemption. The universal offer of salvation proves universal accountability to law.

The Final Judgment Evidence

Revelation 20:12 describes the final judgment: "And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened... and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." This is universal judgment of all humanity - "small and great" - not Jews only. James 2:12 confirms we will be "judged by the law of liberty," referencing the Ten Commandments. All humanity cannot be judged by a law that applies only to Jews.

The Remnant Evidence

Revelation 12:17 identifies God's end-time people as those who "keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." Revelation 14:12 repeats: "Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus." These remnant people come from "every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people" (Revelation 14:6), not from Jews only. They keep the commandments - proving the commandments apply universally.

The Legal Impossibility Argument

It would be legally incoherent and morally unjust for God to:

  1. Judge all humanity by a law that applies only to some
  2. Punish all humanity for breaking a law that wasn't given to all
  3. Require Christ's universal sacrifice for a non-universal law
  4. Write His law on Gentile hearts in the New Covenant if it never applied to them

The legal principle of justice requires that one can only be held accountable to laws that apply to them. Since all humanity faces judgment, all humanity must be under law.

Conclusion

The evidence establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the moral law applies universally to all humanity. This universal application is proven by:

  • Its existence before any ethnic distinctions
  • Its operation in judging pre-Jewish peoples
  • The universal consequences of its violation through Adam
  • The universal promise of redemption from its violation
  • The explicit statements about Gentile accountability
  • The universal scope of final judgment

The ceremonial law, added later to reveal the remedy for sin through the promised seed, had specific application to Israel as the nation through whom the Messiah would come. But the moral law - the Ten Commandments including the Sabbath - was established at creation for all humanity, violated by humanity's federal head affecting all descendants, and remains the standard by which all humanity is judged.

Any claim that the Ten Commandments apply only to Jews requires explaining why non-Jews die (the penalty for law-breaking), why non-Jews need salvation (redemption from law-breaking), why non-Jews face judgment (accountability to law), and why Christ died for non-Jews (to pay their law-penalty). The universal impact of sin proves universal application of the law that defines sin. The case is legally conclusive: the moral law, including the Sabbath commandment, applies to all humanity.

← Previous: Test 1 Next: Test 3 →