Test 3: Pre-Mosaic Law Evidence
The Central Questions
How did God judge sin from Adam to Moses - a period spanning approximately 2,500 years? What law existed that made the actions of Cain, the antediluvian world, and Sodom sinful? Were there universal laws that all humanity was expected to know and follow before the formal codification at Sinai? These questions are crucial for establishing whether the Ten Commandments represent eternal moral law or temporary ethnic legislation introduced at Sinai.
The Legal Principle: No Judgment Without Law
The foundational legal principle that governs this entire analysis comes from Romans 4:15: "Where no law is, there is no transgression," and Romans 5:13: "Sin is not imputed when there is no law." This creates an absolute legal requirement: for God to judge actions as sinful and impose penalties, law must exist defining those actions as violations. Every divine judgment in the pre-Mosaic period therefore proves the existence of operative law.
God's character as revealed in Scripture includes perfect justice: "Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?" (Genesis 18:25). "Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne" (Psalm 89:14). A just God cannot punish where no law exists to violate. Therefore, every instance of divine judgment before Sinai constitutes legal evidence of existing law.
The Case of Cain: The First Murder
The first recorded divine judgment after Eden involves Cain's murder of Abel. Genesis 4:9-11 records God's response: "And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper? And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground. And now art thou cursed from the earth."
Legal Observations from Cain's Case
- God holds Cain accountable for murder without explaining that killing is wrong - He assumes Cain knows this
- Cain's defensive response suggests he understands he's violated a known standard
- God imposes a specific curse as punishment, indicating judicial proceeding rather than arbitrary action
The critical question: by what law was Cain's action murder rather than merely killing? No explicit command "thou shalt not kill" appears in the Genesis record before this event. Yet God treats it as a violation deserving punishment. The only coherent explanation is that the moral law later codified as the sixth commandment was already known and operative.
Furthermore, when Cain fears retribution, saying "every one that findeth me shall slay me" (Genesis 4:14), he reveals a universal understanding that murder deserves death. How would "everyone" know to execute justice for murder unless universal law existed making murder punishable by death?
The Antediluvian Judgment: Universal Moral Corruption
The flood narrative provides compelling evidence of universal moral law. Genesis 6:5 states: "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Verse 11 adds: "The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence."
The Legal Significance of Universal Judgment
God judged not just a city or nation but the entire world, save eight souls. This universal judgment requires universal law. God could not justly destroy Chinese, African, American, and Middle Eastern populations for violating a law given only to one ethnic group that didn't yet exist. The universality of judgment proves universality of law.
The specific violations mentioned - wickedness, evil thoughts, corruption, and violence - correspond to commandments later codified at Sinai. Violence violates the sixth commandment. Corruption suggests violations of multiple moral principles. The evil imagination of thoughts connects to the tenth commandment against coveting.
Genesis 6:9 describes Noah as "just" and "perfect in his generations" who "walked with God." The Hebrew word for "just" (tsaddiq) means righteous according to a standard. By what standard was Noah righteous if no law existed? Noah's righteousness implies knowledge of and obedience to divine law.
The Judgment of Sodom: Sexual and Social Violations
The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah provides another pre-Mosaic example of divine judgment based on moral law. Genesis 18:20 records: "And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous."
Multiple Moral Law Violations in Sodom
- Sexual immorality - violating the seventh commandment
- Violence - violating the sixth commandment
- Pride - violating the first commandment (elevating self above God)
- Neglect of the poor - violating love of neighbor
Abraham's negotiation with God about sparing the city assumes a universal standard of righteousness that both God and Abraham recognize. Abraham doesn't ask God to explain what constitutes righteousness - both parties understand the standard.
The Case of Abimelech: Adultery Recognized by Pagans
Genesis 20 provides remarkable evidence that even pagan kings recognized moral law. When Abimelech takes Sarah, God warns him in a dream: "Behold, thou art but a dead man, for the woman which thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife" (v. 3).
Abimelech, a Philistine king, immediately recognizes that taking another man's wife deserves death. He knew adultery was sin before any written law existed. God acknowledges Abimelech's integrity, confirming that moral standards were known and recognized even among non-Hebrews.
Joseph and Potiphar's Wife: Pre-Sinai Recognition of Sin
Joseph's response to Potiphar's wife provides explicit pre-Sinai acknowledgment of sin. When propositioned, Joseph responds: "How then can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?" (Genesis 39:9). Joseph uses the word "sin" - the same word used throughout Scripture for law violation. He calls adultery "great wickedness" and recognizes it as "sin against God."
This occurred approximately 200 years before Sinai, while Joseph lived in Egypt among pagans. Yet he knew adultery was sin against God. By what standard? The only answer: the moral law that existed from creation and was known to all humanity.
The Testimony of Job: Ancient Recognition of Moral Law
The book of Job, set in the patriarchal period, provides extensive evidence of moral law knowledge. Job 31 contains Job's oath of innocence, where he lists actions he avoided because they were sinful:
Job's Comprehensive Moral Understanding
- Lust and adultery (vv. 1, 9-12) - seventh commandment
- Falsehood and deceit (vv. 5-8) - ninth commandment
- Injustice to servants (vv. 13-15) - love of neighbor
- Neglect of the poor (vv. 16-23) - second table of law
- Trust in wealth (vv. 24-25) - first commandment (idolatry)
- Idolatry/sun worship (vv. 26-28) - first and second commandments
Job explicitly calls idolatry "an iniquity to be punished by the judge" (v. 28) and adultery "a heinous crime; yea, it is an iniquity to be punished by the judges" (v. 11). His comprehensive moral understanding demonstrates detailed knowledge of the principles later codified in the Ten Commandments.
The Pattern of Sabbath Observance
While not explicitly mentioned in every pre-Mosaic account, evidence suggests Sabbath knowledge existed from creation. Genesis 2:2-3 states God "blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it" at creation. The Hebrew word "sanctified" (qadash) means to set apart as holy.
The Seven-Day Pattern in Genesis
The division of time into seven-day weeks appears throughout early Genesis. Noah repeatedly waits "seven days" (Genesis 7:4, 10; 8:10, 12). This seven-day cycle, not based on any natural phenomenon like months (moon) or years (sun), suggests continuation of the creation week pattern established by God.
The Legal Framework Established
The cumulative evidence establishes beyond reasonable doubt that moral law existed and operated from creation to Sinai. This law was:
Characteristics of Pre-Mosaic Moral Law
- Universal in scope - Applied to all humanity, not specific ethnic groups
- Consistent in content - The same principles appear repeatedly across cultures
- Known to conscience - People recognized violations without detailed explanation
- Judicially enforced - God consistently judged and punished violations
- Perpetual in nature - The law operated continuously without interruption
The Sinai Codification
When God gave the Ten Commandments at Sinai, He was not introducing new moral concepts but codifying in permanent form the eternal moral law that had operated since creation. The stone tablets provided a written record of what had been known to conscience but increasingly corrupted or forgotten due to sin's effects.
This explains why the Ten Commandments contain no surprises or radical new concepts for Israel. They recognized these principles as the ancient path of righteousness their fathers had known.
Conclusion
The pre-Mosaic period provides overwhelming evidence that moral law existed and operated from creation to Sinai. Every divine judgment required law to violate. Every recognition of sin required a standard to transgress. Every distinction between righteous and wicked required a measurement to differentiate.
The specific sins judged - murder, violence, sexual immorality, corruption, idolatry - correspond precisely to the Ten Commandments later written in stone. This wasn't coincidence but consistency. God judged by the same moral standard throughout history because His character doesn't change and His moral law reflects that unchanging character.
The universality of pre-Mosaic judgments - affecting all nations and peoples - proves the universality of moral law. God could not justly judge diverse populations by a law that applied only to future Israelites. The law had to be universal for the judgment to be just.
This evidence establishes that the Ten Commandments, including the Sabbath, represent not temporary Jewish legislation but eternal moral law operative from creation, known to human conscience, consistently enforced by divine judgment, and finally codified in stone at Sinai for permanent preservation.